Funded through the support of First 5 Sacramento

 
  Contact Us   |   Feedback

Home      Home Visitation     Family Resource Centers    Locations     Evaluations     Collaborative    Providers

Year One Evaluation Report Executive Summary

Home Visitation April 07 Literature Review

Year Two Evaluation Report Executive Summary

2007 Child Abuse and Neglect Indicator Report 7-07

Year Three Evaluation Report Executive Summary

B&B 06/07 Annual Report

Year Four Evaluation Report Executive Summary

     2007 CPS Outcomes Final Report
Final CPS Report 2006 B&B 07/08 Annual Report
  

Overview of Evaluation Design: Birth & Beyond Program

The evaluation includes both process and outcome components. The process evaluation component focuses on describing the program implementation including clients and services provided, as well as acknowledgment of the systems change and collaboration elements of the Birth & Beyond Program. The outcome evaluation component focuses on assessments of program effectiveness with respect to changes with knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors for parents/families, children, and the community.

(1) Process evaluation is designed to document implementation of the program, to provide advice in a formative manner to improve implementation and to track systems change. Collaboration at the county and site level will be examined as part of the process evaluation, identifying elements that facilitate program development, implementation, and service delivery. Periodic surveys of the Family Support Collaborative (FSC) and site level collaboratives will provide ongoing feedback regarding programmatic and systemic enhancements and barriers related to working in collaborative relationships.

Program and staff development will also be addressed in the process evaluation. Evaluation staff will meet with program staff periodically as part of the data collection process. In particular, there will be annual site visits to conduct interviews and focus group discussions with staff and to review case files and other documentation. Through this ongoing site visit process it will be possible to determine what is working, what is challenging, and identify issues for problem solving at both the site and the county collaborative level. In addition, policies and procedures and staff training will be tracked to determine how well sites maintain fidelity to the Birth & Beyond program model.

The process evaluation also includes descriptive information about services and clients, to help determine how the program is being implemented. Without this information it will be extremely difficult to link outcomes to program or client characteristics. Therefore, the process evaluation will generate demographic profiles of clients and home visitors; risk profiles of clients; home visitation services provided and levels of participation. Process evaluation reports such as monthly participation reports will provide valuable information to the sites, the county agencies, and the Family Support Collaborative. Monthly participation reports may include home visit "no show" rates, and other indications of engagement and retention of families. Baseline assessment scores and the Client Information Forms will provide basic descriptive information on each client. Client Activity Records and Home Visitation Records will provide information about services received by the client.

(2) Outcome evaluation is designed to discern the impact of the program on clients, family and community. In the absence of a formal comparison group or random assignment, the evaluation will focus on comparisons of client status, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors pre- and post-program. For the Birth & Beyond program the primary client is the mother, for whom most pre- and post-assessment comparisons will determine outcomes. In addition there will be key outcomes associated with the well being of the infant, including immunizations.

The six required assessments for Birth & Beyond programs and the Client Intake Form will provide baseline information about the client on several dimensions of risk for child abuse or neglect. In addition the local evaluation will include a more comprehensive Family Assessment at six month intervals to measure progress along multiple dimensions related to the physical environment of the home, the caregiver(s), interactions between the caregiver(s) and the child, and health factors. In addition key health behaviors will be tracked to insure adequate prenatal and pediatric care as indicators of reduced risk for child abuse and neglect. With the assistance of the Public Health Nursing representatives on the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT), the evaluation will incorporate immunizations, well-baby visits, and linkages with a primary care physician to demonstrate preventative health maintenance (vs. crisis health care via emergency room visits).

Longer term outcomes will include indicators such as referral to Children’s Protective Services, completion rates of immunizations of toddlers by age two, changes in assessments, and children’s readiness for pre-school. Fidelity to the model will be a consideration in the outcome evaluation because of the necessity of linking program activities to outcomes in the data analysis.

Evaluation Overview: Research Questions, Indicators and Methods to Gather Information

Research Question

Process Evaluation

Outcome Evaluation

Measures/indicators

Methods to gather information

1. How is the Birth & Beyond Program being implemented in Sacramento County, both county wide, in the nine sites and across sites?

 

U  

Program model description including goals, organization, staffing, services, functioning of teams, engagement and retention of families, etc. Fidelity to Birth & Beyond model. Increase in collaboration among service providers, both public and private agencies. Increase in parent participation.

Interviews with staff; focus groups; interviews with clients; program observation; review of data from software; ratings on self assessments of collaborative functioning

2. What are the barriers to implementation and how have they been addressed?

 

U

 

Identified barriers and solutions at county level; program level, and site level.

Interviews; focus groups; ratings on self assessments of collaborative functioning

3. What lessons are being learned about Birth & Beyond Programs and ancillary services like the Family Resource Centers and multi-disciplinary teams?

 

U

 

Identified lessons learned at county level; program level, cross program or site. Documentation of systems change at county and site level.

Interviews; focus groups; program observation; review of data from software; ratings on self assessments of collaboratives

4. Who are the clients being referred to the Birth & Beyond Program? What are their risk factors and program service needs?

 

U

U

Demographic profile of clients; results on assessments at intake and periodic follow up;

Information gathered by site level staff and entered into management information system and B&B data base; data submitted by site to evaluation team

5. How long do families participate in the Birth & Beyond Program and what dosage of services do they receive?

 

U

U

Number of services; nature of services; length of service. Retention rates. No show rates for home visits. Rates of engagement of families. Match between race/language/culture of home visitor and families served.

MIS and B&B data submitted by sites; interviews; program observation; focus groups; individual client interviews

6. What is the impact on the families served: (a.) to what extent are identified risks reduced and (b.) Their resiliency to child abuse and neglect increased? (c.) What is their status upon exiting the program?

Reduction of risk

 

U

Changes on pre- and post-program assessments of substance abuse; family violence; depression; maternal social support; parenting skills; post program involvement in CPS; increase in the length of time between subsequent pregnancies; changes in county rates of child abuse and neglect

Assessment results at intake and at 6 month intervals, entered into B&B data base; CPS follow up substantiated referrals post program participation; information on clients gathered by home visitors; community indicator data

Resiliency to child abuse and neglect

 

U

Increased use of social supports; increased knowledge of child development, reduction in tendency to use corporal punishment; increase in children ready for preschool countywide

Focus groups; interview with clients; information on usage of services from MIS; reports from county pre school and Head Start programs

Status at exit

 

U

Post program results on assessment listed above in: (a) post program involvement in CPS; and (b) usage of social supports

MIS and B&B data; closure form information; CPS follow up on substantiated referrals

7. What is the impact on infants born to families in the program? To what extent do they thrive developmentally and along selected health dimensions?

 

 

U

Immunization rates and well baby health care; reduced infant mortality

Assessment results submitted to evaluator; immunization and health care information gathered by home visitors and entered in MIS and B&B data base.

 

Disclaimer  |  Credits  |  Contact Us

© Copyright 2000, Birth & Beyond/Family Support Collaborative.  All rights reserved.